Pulse Clinical Intelligence
A clinical decision workspace that helps care teams move from scattered patient signals to clear, accountable next steps.

Role
Product Designer
Timeline
12 weeks
Team
3 Engineers, 1 PM, 2 Clinical SMEs, 1 Product Designer
Platform
Web & Tablet
Overview
Pulse is a clinical intelligence workspace that helps multidisciplinary care teams understand changing patient risk and coordinate the next best action. It combines longitudinal records, observations, lab trends, care plans, and team communication in one decision-focused view. The engagement covered discovery, product definition, workflow design, prototyping, usability testing, and a scalable interface system for desktop and tablet use.
The challenge
Clinicians were moving between the electronic health record, spreadsheets, secure messages, and specialist tools to assemble a complete picture. Important changes were visible, but rarely presented with the context needed to judge urgency. The existing dashboard rewarded scanning large volumes of data rather than recognizing meaningful change. Any redesign also needed to respect clinical accountability by showing provenance, confidence, ownership, and the difference between a recommendation and a confirmed decision.
Research and insight
Contextual interviews and workflow observation revealed that teams did not need another summary of everything known about a patient. They needed a shared explanation of what had changed since the last review. We mapped handoffs across physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and care coordinators, then identified recurring decision moments. This led to a change-first model that pairs every signal with its source, clinical relevance, responsible owner, and a clear path to the underlying record.
Product strategy
The product was structured around three questions: What changed, what does it mean, and what happens next. A patient timeline preserves chronology, while a priority layer surfaces material changes without hiding the full history. Team plans translate recommendations into explicit tasks, owners, and review dates. Rather than presenting artificial certainty, the system communicates confidence and competing evidence so clinicians can apply judgment and record the reasoning behind a decision.
Experience architecture
The main workspace opens with a cohort view that supports risk-based filtering, saved rounds, and rapid comparison. Selecting a patient reveals a persistent context panel, an explainable signal feed, and a collaborative care plan. Trend views align medications, observations, and laboratory values on the same time axis. Review mode packages relevant evidence into a concise sequence for meetings, while handoff mode makes unresolved questions and responsibility immediately visible.
Interface system
We designed a restrained light interface that prioritizes readable density and predictable interaction. Color is used semantically and never as the only carrier of urgency. Cards, tables, charts, and timelines share consistent provenance and confidence patterns. The component library includes loading, delayed-data, conflicting-data, and restricted-access states because clinical products must communicate uncertainty as carefully as success. Typography, focus order, contrast, and touch targets were tested for accessibility across desktop and tablet.
Outcome
The prototype helped clinicians complete simulated patient reviews with fewer context switches and a stronger shared understanding of ownership. Participants consistently described the change-first feed as easier to act on than a conventional dashboard of totals. The work gave Pulse a validated product direction, a prioritized roadmap, and a reusable system for expanding into additional specialties while preserving traceability, clinical caution, and team accountability.
